Unlike Zapier, BuildShip provides integrated AI capabilities allowing you to create nodes for any integration using AI, export the full code as JS and a fully managed, scalable cloud backend. It lets you convert prompts into fully coded workflows while also allowing you instantly create APIs, scheduled jobs, and database CRUD workflows
An Infinite Canvas to Build your ideas
Everything is possible, create professional-grade APIs, Scheduled Jobs, AI Assistants, Payment Systems, Database Integrations and more.
Generate Your Own Nodes with AI
Browse through a large set of ready-made nodes or create one using AI. No more waiting for integrations – bring your ideas to life, without code!
Extend with custom code when needed
Experience the power of a code editor equipped with autocomplete, a lightning-fast debugger similar to localhost, and a secure sandboxing environment.
BuildShip vs Zapier: Which is better for building your no-code backend and AI workflows?
Feature
Zapier
BuildShip
What does it mean for you?
Platform Type
Cloud-only (100% SaaS). All workflows run on Zapier’s servers. No on-prem or private-network deployment.
Cloud or self-host. You can export and run code on Vercel, AWS, Azure, GCP or on-prem. Supports VPC and private networks
Zapier is easy to spin up but you must trust Zapier’s cloud. BuildShip gives you full control – you can isolate data behind firewalls or on your own cloud.
Integrations & APIs
8,000+ ready-made app integrations for common SaaS and cloud services. Can use Webhooks or Code steps for custom APIs. All connectivity is API-driven (no native FTP/legacy RPA).
Hundreds of built-in nodes for databases, messaging, AI models, etc. + a generic HTTP/REST node. Can call any external API or NPM library. BuiltShip’s platform is open to custom dev (scripts, LLM prompts, etc.)
Zapier excels at quickly connecting popular apps without coding. BuildShip can also connect many tools, but shines when you need custom integrations, complex logic, or AI.
Workflow Complexity
Supports multi-step Zaps with basic branching (Paths) and filters. No native loops or parallel flows. Logic is mostly linear (“trigger → actions”). Each step is an action; complex calculations require code steps.
Supports advanced logic: loops, branching, parallel execution, error-handling, and sub-workflows. Allows custom script nodes with full JS/TS. Workflows can be arbitrarily complex (including multi-phase branching, retries, etc.).
For simple workflows Zapier is straightforward. For complex business logic (loops, data transformations, exception handling), BuildShip offers far more flexibility and power.
Code & Extensibility
Limited code support. Has “Code by Zapier” step for short JS/Python scripts (with execution time limits). Cannot export or version workflow code. No native Git integration.
Full code-first backend. Everything runs as Node.js under the hood. You can export workflows as JavaScript (clean modular code) and manage in Git. Supports npm packages, unit tests, and IDE-like debugging.
Zapier is mainly no-code; you can only insert small custom scripts. BuildShip is no-code and full-code: developers can write production-grade backend code with version control and testing.
Version Control / CI/CD
Zapier Enterprise has “version comparisons” for Zaps and an API to fetch run history, but workflows cannot be checked into Git or deployed through CI. No built-in dev/staging environments.
Built-in GitHub integration: every change is committed and traceable. Supports development/staging/production environments natively. Workflows can be managed alongside code in standard CI/CD pipelines.
Zapier lets you compare Zap versions in its UI, but lacks true source control. BuildShip lets teams treat workflows as code – with branches, PRs, and automated deployments.
Team Collaboration & RBAC
Team Plan/Enterprise: shared workspace, shared apps/connections, and multi-user support (up to 25 users on “Team”, unlimited on Enterprise). Enterprise adds a “Super Admin” role and SSO/SCIM. Basic roles only.
Rich RBAC model: assign Admin/Editor/Viewer roles at workspace or workflow level. Includes shared team libraries of flows and custom nodes (Starter tier and above). Dedicated support and training for teams.
Zapier supports basic collaboration (multiple users, permissions per Zap) but roles are coarse. BuildShip lets large teams lock down which users can edit or view each workflow, improving security and auditability.
Monitoring & Logging
Provides run history and error logs for each Zap. Enterprise plans include an Analytics Dashboard and a “Zap Runs” API. Audit logs record user actions (Enterprise). No native integration with external logging/metrics tools.
Detailed logs, real-time error reporting, and uptime dashboards. You can integrate with external APM or observability tools. BuildShip lets you write unit tests for workflows and view execution logs per step. Supports alerts/notifications on failures.
Zapier lets you see whether each Zap run succeeded or failed and gives basic analytics, but deeper observability is limited. BuildShip offers enterprise-grade monitoring (logs, metrics, alerts) and can feed data to existing CI/CD or logging stacks.
Monitoring & Analytics
Built-in analytics dashboards (enterprise) and execution logs. Audit logs of user actions. No built-in uptime SLA or external log export.
Provides detailed logs, execution dashboard, error alerts and log retention (up to 60+ days). Can integrate with external monitoring tools.
Make.com helps monitor process usage and user activity in-platform. BuildShip lets developers hook workflows into enterprise observability (like DataDog or Sentry) for richer insights.
Security & Compliance
Zapier meets industry standards (SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA). Enterprise plans add SAML SSO, IP allowlisting, custom data retention, and audit logs. Data is encrypted in transit/rest.
BuildShip is built for regulated domains: it is HIPAA-, GDPR-, SOC2-, and ISO-27001-compliant out of the box. Sensitive keys/tokens are never exposed in the UI. Full VPC/air-gap support and the ability to self-host gives the ultimate data control.
For standard enterprise use, both platforms offer strong security controls. The key difference is that BuildShip can run entirely in your secure environment (fulfilling stricter compliance like healthcare/finance), whereas Zapier is an external cloud service (even if compliant).
Pricing Model
Usage-based (tasks/month) + per-user for higher tiers. Free tier (100 tasks/mo) and paid tiers (Pro/Team) with increasing task limits. Enterprise is custom-priced.
Tiered subscription per team with fixed quotas (“credits” = workflow triggers). Generous free tier and flat rates ($19, $59, etc.) for higher volumes. You can also self-host the exported code for free (beyond usage limits) if desired.
Zapier’s model scales with number of automations and users, which can become costly for high-volume backends. BuildShip offers fixed tiers with built-in versioning and often lower cost for complex workflows; plus, you can avoid vendor fees by self-hosting exported code.
Why BuildShip is a powerful alternative to Zapier
Don't take our word for it
I don’t necessarily use BuildShip to do things one can’t in other tools, I just love how fast it is and how it adds customisability over tools like Make.
Moritz
Developer
BuildShip better than n8n , make or zapier because its made to be a backend. It can handle requests faster n more scalable
Grey
Founder @modul.so
Trusted by Teams Worldwide
